 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Writing On The Wall By Hilmar von Campe The Declaration of
Independence states: “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that
all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and
the Pursuit of Happiness – That to secure these Rights, Governments
are instituted among Men…that whenever any Form of Government
becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the right of the People to
alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government….” Terri Schiavo was
robbed of her constitutional right to life and sentenced to a gruesome
death by starving by Judge George Greer. The sentence was upheld by a
whole chain of courts up to the Supreme Court. Terri did not receive
due process. The whole legal case was constructed on the dubious
fundament, that her former husband Michael, a repeatedly unrepentant
adulterer, represented her best legal interest. He had no proof that
she wanted to die and there is enough evidence to raise suspicion
concerning his true intentions. But this evidence was not accepted by
Greer or any other judges. The reason given for the inhuman death
sentence was that she was in a “persistent vegetative state”.
That, however, is not a fact, proven by modern technology and an
unbiased group of neurologists. There was never a MRI taken. I heard a
neurologist say that one EG would show within half an hour what the
brain damage amounts to. The reason given is nothing but
disinformation, or, in other words, a plain lie. There was plenty of
evidence that Terry reacted to stimuli, including interaction with her
family. Those who shut her parents out were not interested in truth
and her best interest but in her death. The
order to take the tube out was an order to execute her by starvation.
It was driven by motives, which did not surface, and violated the
letter and the spirit of the Constitution. As a matter of fact, Terri
did not need to use the tube at all, which was not a life sustaining
instrument but only fed her. She could have been nourished directly,
and that is what some of the nurses occasionally did behind the back
of Michael Schiavo, and against his instructions. She must have been
aware of what her ex-husband was doing and it must have been hell on
earth to lie there unable to defend herself - abandoned by one branch
of government. Alabama Supreme Court
Justice Tom Parker called the state-sanctioned killing of Terri
Schiavo a “shameful miscarriage of justice.”
He quotes the Florida Constitution which states, that “No
person shall be deprived of any right because of race, religion,
national origin, or physical disability,” (Article 1, Section 2 ) Dr. Jörg-Dietrich
Hoppe, President of the German medical association issued a statement
that was published by the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, and
concluded: “In the case of patient Schiavo, her probable wishes
could not be determined beyond question. Therefore, in such doubtful
cases, the maintenance of life is an absolute priority. We must not
permit the presumption that patients would renounce life just because
of their state of ‘waking coma.’
Respect for life and for the worth of every person forbids it.” I have accumulated
over the last weeks a pile of reports from various sources with
testimonies from different people, and like many, spent hours
following the events on television. On March 24, 2005 WorldNetDaily
published on March 24 a comprehensive analysis by Dianne Lynne of the
12 year-old legal battle. Many individual facts, which I gathered from
other sources, are put by the author into the context of a 12 year
development and present themselves as undeniable truth. They are
strengthened by the indescribable destructive behavior of Michael
Schiavo toward Terry and the Schindler family. Nobody who loves his
wife would treat her father and mother and brothers with such
contempt. These are the facts:
Michael Schiavo discovered his desire to help Terri to die after he
received $2 million compensation in a mal-practice suit trial and
seven years into Terri’s condition. Before ha had the money he had
assured the court and everybody else that he
would stick to his wife and personally do the therapy and
rehabilitation. Eight months later he tried to kill her for the first
time. Other attempts followed. Her parents, however, suspect that the
crippling accident was the result of his attempt to strangle her. $1.3
million of the reward were supposed to be spent for Terri’s therapy
and rehabilitation. Instead he did not allow any of it and spent part
of it on his lawyers to have her killed. (“when is that bitch gonna
die?”) Apparently the marriage was already on the rocks when the
accident happened. Money appears as his motivation. It is hard to believe
that with the existing overwhelming evidence of foul play the judicial
system simply ignored and excluded this evidence, allowed for the
parents in a family oriented America to be pushed aside, treated the
wishes of the voters represented by Congress and the president with
contempt, and executed a helpless person in the cruelest manner
possible, which is not even applied to serial killers. Therefore, a
hidden agenda must exist, one in which the judges take cover behind
legal paragraphs, which they quote, but follow a hidden agenda with
the end determined beforehand. That type of procedure was also Nazi
practice. Judge Freisler, one of the worst of the Nazi judges,
condemned the participants in the failed July 20th 1944
coup to kill Hitler - the very crème of During an interview on
Fox News, a witness was asked why she had not filed her evidence in
the court system. She responded, “Because I was told by the judge
that they had made up their minds and that Terri was not worth the
effort to sustain her life.” The Nazis used precisely the same
language when they tried to kill handicapped and other “worthless”
people, such as Jews, Slavs, gypsies, German opposition and others .10
miles from my hometown is the well-known Bethel Institute in But there is another
frightening parallel. It was not just a single judge but a series of
judges on the appeals ladder, who discarded not only the
constitutional rights of a helpless person, but also the instructions
of the President and The Congress to the federal court, to review the
entire case. They didn’t do it. Latest at that point, but in my view
much earlier, the executive branch should have stepped in, with force
if necessary, to save the life of Terri Schiavo and restore the rule
of the Constitution. So why didn’t they step in? Who are the legal
advisors? The president could have sent a Federal Marshall or a whole
army of them. Germans like myself
under Nazi rule did not have the guts to stand up against the
discrimination of the Jews when it begun. The leaders of the
conservative and Christian parties thought that Hitler and the Nazis
would stop the frightening advance of the Communist Party. So they
helped to get Hitler elected on January 30, 1933. They had made a
political decision believing that they could control a Hitler in
power. They had not evaluated the underlying moral and ideological
foundation of the Nazi party. Within weeks Hitler had established a
one party totalitarian regime and those who helped him to power were
caught without escape in the web of lies and terror he created. At the end it were few
generals with the power to put Hitler out of business and save This is the
hand-writing on the wall: It is a warning that
Download the printer friendly file for this article.
Home ¦ Nat'l Institute ¦ Keynote Addresses ¦ Monthly Articles ¦ Hilmar's Books Holocaust Statement ¦ What's New ¦ Personal History ¦ Family Biography Global Ideology ¦ Dignitaries ¦ Audio Interview ¦ Reviews Testimonial Letters ¦ Links ¦ Contact Us ¦ Site Map
|
|
